Geek Arguments #1
I am in no small part, a bit of a geek. I've argued about Star Wars and Star Trek minutiae as though knowing how a light saber worked or untangling time paradoxes earned me money. I can argue over comics, sci-fi movies, football strategy, and even dabble a bit in video game smugness (for no reason I can think of). This time, prompted by what should be an obvious answer about a movie nobody cares about, I just have to set the record straight for nobody in particular. That and I just can't talk politics anymore for a while.
I am in no small part, a bit of a geek. I've argued about Star Wars and Star Trek minutiae as though knowing how a light saber worked or untangling time paradoxes earned me money. I can argue over comics, sci-fi movies, football strategy, and even dabble a bit in video game smugness (for no reason I can think of). This time, prompted by what should be an obvious answer about a movie nobody cares about, I just have to set the record straight for nobody in particular. That and I just can't talk politics anymore for a while.
Ben Affleck
likes to relate the story that during the production of Armageddon (a terrible
film that I will watch over and over) that when he asked the question
"Wouldn't it have been easier to train the astronauts to drill?" that
director Micheal Bay told him to "shut the f**k up." This of course was
the proper answer. Because Ben's question was stupid and he should have
just shut the f**k up.
Let me state definitively that NO, it wouldn't have been easier to train astronauts to drill. Everyone would have died. Are we clear? Oh, you want an explanation?
While
it is true that astronauts are smart, most holding several degrees as
well as being engineers, the idea that they would be able to immediately
be able to grasp all the fine points of drilling in the week or so of training
they would have received is the height of elitist thinking. Proficiency
or even mastery of Discipline A does not automatically translate into
easy of learning semi-related Discipline B. The intellectual arrogance
here is staggering, starting with the assumption that "drilling" must be
easy. But rather than get into a long line of theory of the nuances of
mining and instead I'm going to use the film itself show why this is
terrible assumption.
Wouldn't trust them with a potato gun. |
First, when the
hero, Harry Stamper, arrives at NASA it's originally because government stole
his drill design to use on Mars but now want to use it on the asteroid,
but can't make the damned thing work. Let me say that again : a group of
NASA scientists, engineers and the man the NASA director called the
'smartest man on the planet' can't figure out how to make a particular
drill work after presumably weeks of going at it. Presumably one or two
of the engineers present even had some mining expertise, but it still
didn't help them. On the other hand, Harry the not NASA engineer arrives
and after looking at the equipment for less than a minute not only
tells them the issues they're probably experiencing (and he's correct)
but also diagnoses the problem. But mining must be simple, right? The
equipment a breeze to operate?
Secondly, when the spaceship actually arrives on the asteroid,
Harry's team faces a number of unexpected challenges. First, they
overshoot the landing and instead of the intended drilling site land on
an 'iron plate.' Would the less experienced trained for a week Astronaut
miners have even tried to drill there? Assuming they did, the first
drill bit breaks after ten feet, something Max recognizes by feel. Would
a less experienced trained for a week Astronaut miner have recognized
it as quickly as Max? Then, the other experienced miner Chick defers to
Harry who decides they need to break out a special bit, referred to in
the film as 'the judge.' Would a less experienced trained for a week
Astronaut miner been able to make the determination that they weren't just unlucky? Would they have been able
to handle the gas pockets, the ones the experienced miners couldn't?
And
finally, would a less experienced trained for a week Astronaut miners
have taken the Time to Drill Card as gospel, dropped off the nuke and
evacuated? Especially when you consider that the Astronaut who was there was prepared and willing to shoot someone did just that! The weird part is that based upon the data at hand, the Astronaut
made the right call - they should have dumped the nuke because by all
rights they shouldn't reached the depth needed.
Honestly, when Chick's son called him "that salesman"... |
It was only the drillers expertise that saved the entire operation. Yes, because NASA chose the drillers over the astronauts (in this movie universe) the world was saved. I'm not even
going to mention the other asteroid movie of the time went exactly the other way. Okay, I'll mention it. How did that work out
for them then? Right, everyone on the spaceship had to make the
ultimate sacrifice so the planet only got a little blowed up. Got it? And since I've brought Deep Impact up now, anyone know why there were carrying the extra nukes?
So, this is why
to question of wouldn't sending astronauts have been simpler in
Armageddon, the answer is a resounding NO. Teaching roughnecks how not
to die in space clearly was. I realize that astronauts are smart. Very smart. But smart doesn't translate to a universal expertise.
Can we let this go now? And someone tell Affleck to shut the fuck up.
No comments:
Post a Comment